Taking stock

 Today was about standing still for a bit and taking some time to take stock of my bigger purpose. I may be trying out a weekly accountability arrangement with someone I connected with on FocusMate.

When I contemplated meeting weekly or with someone working on a large six-month goal I realized I would need to move beyond daily brainstorming here on the blog. So what is the next step, of purposefulness?

Just as I so long put off buckling down and getting to daily writing, I have been putting off embarking on a bona fide research project- my own project, done well, with companions. Actual research, that not only I would find compelling and worthwhile. 

I think I’m going to take the plunge, and turn back to that article in Forbes back in 2014 that slammed the MBTI, with references to research on reliability and repeatability. A good research paper in that area, is a worthy goal for the next 2-3 months. Start with a lit review-- just like they had us do in our capstone project for the master's in health informatics, back in 2019!

Just gotta get started-- and damn the torpedoes!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Slowing down, speeding up

 Last Friday was the three-week mark since I "launched my book project" and I am pleased with the results of my first three weeks of daily blogging. What the writing has helped to do is to locate myself on the map that shows the pathways to effective dissemination of one's new ideas to those who are meant to receive them. I have ideas, ideas that I think people need to receive. But just as my wife sometimes admonishes me to use fewer words (not so much recently, I am pleased to say) orally, I am now going to try to drastically reduce the ratio of words written to words read and to reduce the frequency of posting. I am releasing myself from the obligation to write a post every day. Part of the reason I am able to do this is that tonight at 8pm (ET) I am meeting with my morning Focusmate partner to discuss the possibility of a weekly accountability relationship. Since we are both engaged in the labor of writing words that we believe are inspired, that we believe need to be ...
Read more

A Vision of the Future of Jungian Typology

  What is our vision for the future of Socionics in the world? Here’s my vision: Professional coaches, therapists, and organizational development consultants using the principles of Socionics in their day-to-day work– around the world Groups of lay people all over the world, studying amongst themselves, coaching and helping each other, constantly bringing in new people and teaching them the principles. Meeting online and in person. The principles continually spreading. How do we get there? ‘Pan-Jungian Typing Games’-- a global competition to see whose model of Jungian type discernment works best. All comers: MBTI partisans, Socionics enthusiasts, ‘unaffiliated’ Jungian type thinkers. The rules are simple: each team has two or more ‘squads’ who interview ( in person ) a subject of unknown type. In a sealed room, the first squad conducts their interview, then confers like a jury in a separate room, then a second interview is done, with the subject and the squad discussing the video o...
Read more

Something New on the Horizon - a new Institute

 Yesterday evening I attended a Zoom meeting of the NYC Socionics Society, after two years hanging around the margins of two Socionics groups on Facebook. I feel like the game has suddenly changed. I told the group that I want the concepts of Socionics to take their rightful place in the American landscape, going head to head with the MBTI and the Enneagram. And folks liked the idea. One person in particular seems to be right with me-- she said "We need to get a better name!" (i.e., than Socionics-- not just for American ears, but for the global academic community, I assume she also meant.) What needs to be done? I believe that we need to excavate the source material used by the architects of both the MBTI and Socionics-- Jung's type descriptions in Chapter 10 of Psychological Types . Do we all need to read the previous nine chapters? I don't think so, but it would be nice to pull in a collaborator who has actually read the whole book and understands it. I have the ou...
Read more