All that Is, Seen and Unseen

 It was so exciting to be asked by a Focusmate partner for the URL to my blog, this morning. (Shout out to Ruth L. who is located "London-ish", based on the time zone info on her profile.) If she never looks at it and forgets about it forever, she will have done me a huge service. My blog is purely for myself, and it is also fully exposed to everyone on the whole internet. For an ISFj / ESI (Socionics) or ISFP (MBTI) this is an uncomfortable proposition, because of "Vulnerable Ne" (Ne = Extraverted Intuition).

Is it a coincidence that I am feeling unafraid about that dual reality, right after chatting with Ruth (who may be an ENFp aka IEE / ENFP, with Ne as "Leading Function"? I think not, friends.

Anyway, with my Ne given a shot of clean energy, I went roving on my blog Spreading the Word, and after browsing a little, hit upon the post "Shema Yisrael" (yes, I know now that it's more commonly/properly transliterated Yisroel). This is a 1,700 word post but I am grateful to anyone who takes the time to read it in its entirety. Everyone else, I would ask to hit Control-F and type in "two worlds".

This is why, in my 5/20 post Second Wind, I called for "Four cubes in a square arrangement, a plane, and below the plane a mirroring square arrangement of cubes". The plane separates "the seen and the unseen". Everyone is straddling these "two worlds", every moment of every day that they are alive! Both when they are awake and when they are asleep. But sleep is the time when we let ourselves walk in the shadow world. People die eventually, of lack of sleep. They go crazy, in the waking world, from lack of sleep. Your fitness for driving is affected like when intoxicated on alcohol, when you are sleep-deprived.

We MUST walk in the shadow world, regularly! We were built for it-- by whom? God? Yes. By "blind evolution"? Yes, but.

Right now, after a bunch of years of reading, I haven't found much in the way of joining the principles of "spirituality" with the principles of Jungian typology. I know there are many people who have written about it, and probably are writing about it as I write this, but-- is there a book out there, about it? A book that can be read by anyone in the world? I have a feeling... not.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Slowing down, speeding up

 Last Friday was the three-week mark since I "launched my book project" and I am pleased with the results of my first three weeks of daily blogging. What the writing has helped to do is to locate myself on the map that shows the pathways to effective dissemination of one's new ideas to those who are meant to receive them. I have ideas, ideas that I think people need to receive. But just as my wife sometimes admonishes me to use fewer words (not so much recently, I am pleased to say) orally, I am now going to try to drastically reduce the ratio of words written to words read and to reduce the frequency of posting. I am releasing myself from the obligation to write a post every day. Part of the reason I am able to do this is that tonight at 8pm (ET) I am meeting with my morning Focusmate partner to discuss the possibility of a weekly accountability relationship. Since we are both engaged in the labor of writing words that we believe are inspired, that we believe need to be ...
Read more

A Vision of the Future of Jungian Typology

  What is our vision for the future of Socionics in the world? Here’s my vision: Professional coaches, therapists, and organizational development consultants using the principles of Socionics in their day-to-day work– around the world Groups of lay people all over the world, studying amongst themselves, coaching and helping each other, constantly bringing in new people and teaching them the principles. Meeting online and in person. The principles continually spreading. How do we get there? ‘Pan-Jungian Typing Games’-- a global competition to see whose model of Jungian type discernment works best. All comers: MBTI partisans, Socionics enthusiasts, ‘unaffiliated’ Jungian type thinkers. The rules are simple: each team has two or more ‘squads’ who interview ( in person ) a subject of unknown type. In a sealed room, the first squad conducts their interview, then confers like a jury in a separate room, then a second interview is done, with the subject and the squad discussing the video o...
Read more

Something New on the Horizon - a new Institute

 Yesterday evening I attended a Zoom meeting of the NYC Socionics Society, after two years hanging around the margins of two Socionics groups on Facebook. I feel like the game has suddenly changed. I told the group that I want the concepts of Socionics to take their rightful place in the American landscape, going head to head with the MBTI and the Enneagram. And folks liked the idea. One person in particular seems to be right with me-- she said "We need to get a better name!" (i.e., than Socionics-- not just for American ears, but for the global academic community, I assume she also meant.) What needs to be done? I believe that we need to excavate the source material used by the architects of both the MBTI and Socionics-- Jung's type descriptions in Chapter 10 of Psychological Types . Do we all need to read the previous nine chapters? I don't think so, but it would be nice to pull in a collaborator who has actually read the whole book and understands it. I have the ou...
Read more